for immediate release, august 22, 2014

contacts:
amaroq weiss, center for biological diversity, (707) 779-9613
mike petersen, the lands council, (509) 209-2406
suzanne stone, defenders of wildlife, (208) 861-4655
tim coleman, kettle range conservation group, (509) 775-2667/(509) 435-1092 (cell)
nick cady, cascadia wildlands, (314) 482-3746  

olympia , wash . — eight conservation organizations, representing hundreds of thousands of washington residents, are calling on the washington department of fish and wildlife to rescind a kill order issued earlier this week for wolves of the huckleberry pack. the order authorizes agency staff and a sheep operator to shoot any wolves seen in the vicinity of a band of sheep that has incurred losses due to wolves over the past few weeks. in a letter to the department, the conservation groups urged the agency to continue efforts to deter wolves from killing more sheep using nonlethal means rather than killing wolves, as it did two years ago when seven members of the wedge pack were killed.

“we appreciate the agency’s efforts to work with the rancher and use nonlethal means to protect sheep from further losses,” said amaroq weiss, west coast wolf organizer at the center for biological diversity. “but the wolf kill order needs to be rescinded right away. killing wolves is just not an effective means of protecting livestock.”

between aug. 11 and 12, 14 sheep were confirmed as killed by members of the huckleberry pack in southwestern stevens county, and four more sheep have been killed by wolves since that time. provided the rancher was using sufficient nonlethal deterrence measures at the time, he will be eligible for compensation from the state for the loss of the sheep. the huckleberry pack, with six to 12 members and no prior history of livestock conflicts, spends most of its time on the spokane reservation, but satellite data from the alpha male’s radio collar indicate he was present at the time the sheep were killed.

all of the details are still not clear, but the rancher’s sheep herder had apparently quit some weeks before the incident, and the sheep were thus unattended some or all of the time. the rancher does have four guard dogs. nine additional sheep were killed earlier in the month, but were discovered too late to determine the cause of death.

“before the state moves to killing wolves, it needs to ensure that all nonlethal measures have been exhausted,” said mike petersen, executive director of the lands council. “subsequent deaths might have been averted if conflict-prevention strategies had been put into place earlier, though we are glad to hear reports that the sheep operator is fully cooperating with the agency to implement deterrence methods now.”

the agency is in the process of helping the rancher move his sheep to an alternate location, has multiple staff on site to help deter wolves from approaching the sheep, and has brought in a range rider to help monitor the sheep, along with the operator’s four livestock guard dogs. but the four most recent sheep deaths occurred before many of these measures were in place. despite this fact washington department of wildlife director phil anderson issued the kill order for the wolves wednesday.

“this is not a situation where the agency should yet be engaging in lethal control,” said shawn cantrell, northwest office director for defenders of wildlife. “while the agency’s actions are a huge step up from how they handled the wedge pack in 2012, there’s much more it could be doing before it authorizes the killing of wolves.”

a news report thursday evening from seattle ’s nbc news affiliate king5 news included an onsite interview with an agency staffer, who described the conflict-prevention tools the agency was using, including nonlethal rubber bullets, human presence and guard dogs, and emphasized that the agency is focusing on nonlethal conflict deterrence methods. in addition, this week defenders of wildlife sent the department several “foxlights,” a new tool from wildlife coexistence operations in australia that is already successfully deterring wolves and grizzly bears from livestock in idaho , montana , wyoming and canada . this makes the agency’s issuance of a kill order all the more troubling to conservation groups.

“the agency knows that killing wolves doesn’t stop conflict and in fact the recent science is showing that killing wolves can result in more conflict because of the breakdown it causes in the social structure and size of wolf packs,” said tim coleman, executive director of the kettle range conservation groups. “if the agency is going to tell the public on tv news that it is focusing on nonlethal, it should put its money where its mouth is, pay attention to what science tells us and rescind the kill order.”

washington ’s wolves were driven to extinction in the early 1900s by a government-sponsored eradication program on behalf of the livestock industry. since the early 2000s, the animals have started to make a slow comeback by dispersing into washington from neighboring idaho and british columbia . but wolf recovery is still in its infancy, with only an estimated 52 wolves at the end of 2013. in 2012 the wedge pack was killed in a highly controversial agency lethal control action over wolf-livestock conflicts on public land.

“it is essential that more wolves are not lost from the state’s tiny wolf population because of state-sanctioned lethal control actions that ignore the proven, nonlethal methods of conflict prevention,” said nick cady, legal director for cascadia wildlands.

the letter to the department was filed by the center for biological diversity, cascadia wildlands, the humane society of the united states , defenders of wildlife, western environmental law center, wolf haven international, kettle range conservation group and the lands council.

###